Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video81 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leah Fremouw results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 140 faulty-reasoning hits from 81 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 57.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (9,610 of 39,675 speakers). This Leah Fremouw is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Leah Fremouw
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠76%Leah Fremouw (selected)58%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 81
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.8% percentile
57.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos81 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 46.9%46.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 25.9%25.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 46.9%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 8.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos