Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video12 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lavie's attorney results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Negativity Bias, and Tu Quoque, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 12 hits. Analysis detected 48 faulty-reasoning hits from 12 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (3,126 of 38,388 speakers). This Lavie's attorney is worse (more manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group.
Lavie's attorney
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠92%Lavie's attorney (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 12
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Analyzed articles and videos