Speaker summary
45%1 analyzed article/video114 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Tingle results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Pessimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 36.8% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 232 faulty-reasoning hits from 114 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.9% and a BS Rank of 53% (13,476 of 28,364 speakers). This Laura Tingle is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Laura Tingle
Speaker details