Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video31.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Ellman results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 83.3% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 58 faulty-reasoning hits from 31.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 46% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (14,055 of 39,200 speakers). This Laura Ellman is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
Laura Ellman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠65%Laura Ellman (selected)47%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 31.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510064.1% percentile
46.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos31.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 83.3%83.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 26.2%26.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 28.6%28.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 83.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos