Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kristen Fountain results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Self-Serving Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 70.6% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 101 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 54.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,692 of 28,364 speakers). This Kristen Fountain is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Kristen Fountain
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠73%Kristen Fountain (selected)55%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 51
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos