Speaker summary
75%1 analyzed article/video97.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kim Kragt results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Nature, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 71.9% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 508.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 97.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.4% and a BS Rank of 57% (12,238 of 28,364 speakers). This Kim Kragt is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Kim Kragt
Speaker details