Speaker summary
52%1 analyzed article/video14.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Barnard results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Ad Hominem, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 8 hits. Analysis detected 8 faulty-reasoning hits from 14.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 93% (2,949 of 37,938 speakers). This Kevin Barnard is worse (more manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group.
Kevin Barnard
Speaker details