Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kathy Roberto results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 139 faulty-reasoning hits from 52 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (19,550 of 45,128 speakers). This Kathy Roberto is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Kathy Roberto
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠57%Kathy Roberto (selected)36%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 52
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510056.7% percentile
35.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos52 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 20.5%20.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.8%21.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos