Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kasey Considine results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 60 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (13,590 of 45,119 speakers). This Kasey Considine is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
Kasey Considine
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠70%Kasey Considine (selected)50%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 40
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510069.9% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos40 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos