Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video34.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karim Broodhagen results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 57.7% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 107 faulty-reasoning hits from 34.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (19,227 of 45,142 speakers). This Karim Broodhagen is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Karim Broodhagen
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠58%Karim Broodhagen (selected)37%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 34.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.4% percentile
36.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos34.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 53.9%53.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 57.7%57.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.9%28.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 57.7%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 53.9%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos