Speaker summary
78%1 analyzed article/video73 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karen Spilka results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 260 faulty-reasoning hits from 73 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51.3% and a BS Rank of 72% (8,119 of 28,364 speakers). This Karen Spilka is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Karen Spilka
Speaker details