Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video10.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karen Finney results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, In-Group Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 14 hits. Analysis detected 42.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 10.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 85% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,952 of 21,084 speakers). This Karen Finney is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
Karen Finney
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠82%Karen Finney (selected)85%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 10.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos