Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karen Ajong results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, False Dilemma, and In-Group Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 33.9% saturation with 133.869 hits. Analysis detected 511.285 faulty-reasoning hits from 360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (39,568 of 43,021 speakers). This Karen Ajong is better (less manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group.
Karen Ajong
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠8%Karen Ajong (selected)8%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 360
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751008.0% percentile
7.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos360 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 33.9%33.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.5%14.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 3.6%3.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 33.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos