Speaker summary
69%1 analyzed article/video40.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Juris Zarins results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Representativeness Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Special Pleading as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 77 faulty-reasoning hits from 40.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 45.8% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,705 of 37,882 speakers). This Juris Zarins is worse (more manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
Juris Zarins
Speaker details