Speaker summary
34%3 analyzed articles/videos47.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julie Rovner results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 37.5% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 64 faulty-reasoning hits from 47.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of 52% (13,892 of 28,840 speakers). This Julie Rovner is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Julie Rovner
Speaker details