Speaker summary
93%1 analyzed article/video98 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Curlee results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 70.1% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 388 faulty-reasoning hits from 98 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 47% and a BS Rank of 63% (10,169 of 27,106 speakers). This Julia Curlee is worse (more manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group.
Julia Curlee
Speaker details