Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video25 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Stein’s administration results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 75 faulty-reasoning hits from 25 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (2,763 of 37,458 speakers). This Josh Stein’s administration is worse (more manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group.
Josh Stein’s administration
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠93%Josh Stein’s administration (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 25
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos