Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video39 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Lipsky results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice and Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 117 faulty-reasoning hits from 39 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (2,214 of 28,364 speakers). This Josh Lipsky is worse (more manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group.
Josh Lipsky
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠93%Josh Lipsky (selected)100%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 39
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos