Speaker summary
94%1 analyzed article/video73 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Warren results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 75.5% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 299.547 faulty-reasoning hits from 73 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.7% and a BS Rank of 59% (11,701 of 28,364 speakers). This John Warren is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
John Warren
Speaker details