Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video13.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Rogers results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, In-Group Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 11.25 hits. Analysis detected 51.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 13.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 65% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (9,423 of 45,122 speakers). This John Rogers is worse (more manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group.
John Rogers
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠80%John Rogers (selected)65%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 13.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.1% percentile
65.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos13.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Red Herring: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos