Speaker summary
68%1 analyzed article/video163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Riggins results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, In-Group Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 43.8% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 372.746 faulty-reasoning hits from 163 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (20,492 of 28,364 speakers). This John Riggins is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
John Riggins
Speaker details