Speaker summary
95%1 analyzed article/video25 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Peter results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 50 faulty-reasoning hits from 25 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 93% (2,698 of 37,393 speakers). This John Peter is worse (more manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
John Peter
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
93%John Peter (selected)100%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 25
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos