Speaker summary
82%1 analyzed article/video84 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Moot results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 33.3% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 168 faulty-reasoning hits from 84 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of 59% (11,863 of 28,364 speakers). This John Moot is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
John Moot
Speaker details