Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video50 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John James results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias and No True Scotsman, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 150 faulty-reasoning hits from 50 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,595 of 19,441 speakers). This John James is worse (more manipulative) than 91.80% of the peer group.
John James
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠92%John James (selected)100%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 50
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos