Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Hinderaker results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Slippery Slope, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 230.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 68 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,394 of 28,364 speakers). This John Hinderaker is better (less manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
John Hinderaker
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠43%John Hinderaker (selected)27%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 68
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos