Speaker summary
54%1 analyzed article/video73.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Coyle results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 110 hits. Analysis detected 165 faulty-reasoning hits from 73.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of 70% (12,984 of 43,073 speakers). This John Coyle is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
John Coyle
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
70%John Coyle (selected)50%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 73.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510069.9% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos73.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 31.8%31.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 18.2%18.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 31.8%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos