Speaker summary
94%1 analyzed article/video108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Commerford results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, In-Group Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 164 hits. Analysis detected 1,044.488 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51.9% and a BS Rank of 72% (8,037 of 28,364 speakers). This John Commerford is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
John Commerford
Speaker details