Speaker summary
ā 29%1 analyzed article/video143.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Chisholm results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 108 faulty-reasoning hits from 143.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of ā 12% (24,950 of 28,364 speakers). This John Chisholm is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.
John Chisholm
Speaker details