Speaker summary
67%1 analyzed article/video98.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John A. Eisenberg results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 76.3% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 341.803 faulty-reasoning hits from 98.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (12,732 of 28,364 speakers). This John A. Eisenberg is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
John A. Eisenberg
Speaker details