Speaker summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos173.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Solmonese results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 61.2% saturation with 159 hits. Analysis detected 650.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 173.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 24.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (26,561 of 45,145 speakers). This Joe Solmonese is better (less manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Joe Solmonese
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠42%Joe Solmonese (selected)25%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 173.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510041.2% percentile
24.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos173.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 61.1%61.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 27.7%27.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 36.1%36.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 22.3%22.3%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 61.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 26.9%Straw Man: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 0.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 7.5%Red Herring: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos