Speaker summary
48%1 analyzed article/video85.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Macejak results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Pessimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 35.2% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 154 faulty-reasoning hits from 85.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.1% and a BS Rank of 50% (19,850 of 39,421 speakers). This Joe Macejak is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Joe Macejak
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
50%Joe Macejak (selected)31%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 85.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.6% percentile
30.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos85.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 35.2%35.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 35.2%35.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 35.2%35.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.8%14.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 35.2%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 35.2%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 35.2%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 1.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos