Speaker summary
94%1 analyzed article/video79 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jo Anne Simon results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Fundamental Attribution Error, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 63.4% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 281.796 faulty-reasoning hits from 79 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.1% and a BS Rank of 59% (11,830 of 28,364 speakers). This Jo Anne Simon is worse (more manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Jo Anne Simon
Speaker details