Speaker summary
58%1 analyzed article/video294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jill Laca results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 84.049 hits. Analysis detected 494.928 faulty-reasoning hits from 294 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.1% and a BS Rank of 12% (25,089 of 28,364 speakers). This Jill Laca is better (less manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group.
Jill Laca
Speaker details