Speaker summary
⁠61%2 analyzed articles/videos51.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Wortz results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 60.6% saturation with 33.003 hits. Analysis detected 52.003 faulty-reasoning hits from 51.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 40.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (17,429 of 45,134 speakers). This Jennifer Wortz is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Jennifer Wortz
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠62%Jennifer Wortz (selected)41%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 51.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510061.4% percentile
40.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos51.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 60.6%60.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 21.1%21.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 60.6%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos