Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeff Golden results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 41.2% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 68 faulty-reasoning hits from 68 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (19,673 of 42,607 speakers). This Jeff Golden is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Jeff Golden
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠54%Jeff Golden (selected)34%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 68
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.8% percentile
33.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos68 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 35.3%35.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 41.2%41.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 23.5%23.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 41.2%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 35.3%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos