Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video14 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeff Cox results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 14 hits. Analysis detected 28 faulty-reasoning hits from 14 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (3,057 of 45,128 speakers). This Jeff Cox is worse (more manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Jeff Cox
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠94%Jeff Cox (selected)100%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 14
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

93% percentile
025507510093.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos14 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos