Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video106.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JC Nash results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 51.1% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 266.897 faulty-reasoning hits from 106.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (24,886 of 45,123 speakers). This JC Nash is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
JC Nash
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠45%JC Nash (selected)27%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 106.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
26.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos106.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 51.1%51.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 31.3%31.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 31.1%31.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 25.9%25.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 51.1%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 31.1%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 1.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos