Speaker summary
34%1 analyzed article/video69 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jay Storz results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Pessimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 91 faulty-reasoning hits from 69 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18% and a BS Rank of 29% (20,288 of 28,273 speakers). This Jay Storz is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Jay Storz
Speaker details