Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video22 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason and Linda results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Negativity Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 22 faulty-reasoning hits from 22 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (2,667 of 38,680 speakers). This Jason and Linda is worse (more manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Jason and Linda
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠94%Jason and Linda (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 22
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos