Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Zogby results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Halo Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 56% saturation with 102 hits. Analysis detected 385.456 faulty-reasoning hits from 111 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,613 of 28,364 speakers). This James Zogby is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
James Zogby
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠52%James Zogby (selected)34%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 111
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos