Speaker summary
81%1 analyzed article/video50.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Weingarten results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 92 faulty-reasoning hits from 50.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 47.1% and a BS Rank of 63% (10,542 of 28,364 speakers). This James Weingarten is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
James Weingarten
Speaker details