Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Rutkauski results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Burden of Proof, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 48.8% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 356.897 faulty-reasoning hits from 115 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,130 of 28,364 speakers). This James Rutkauski is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
James Rutkauski
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠47%James Rutkauski (selected)30%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 115
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos