Speaker summary
66%5 analyzed articles/videos727.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Barnacle results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 101.48 hits. Analysis detected 1,038.047 faulty-reasoning hits from 727.5 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 4% (26,304 of 27,215 speakers). This James Barnacle is better (less manipulative) than 96.70% of the peer group.
James Barnacle
Speaker details
Total words: 727.5
Article count: 5
Authors