Speaker summary
⁠66%4 analyzed articles/videos144 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Johnson results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 91.7% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 471.346 faulty-reasoning hits from 144 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 33.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (18,085 of 39,758 speakers). This Jack Johnson is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Jack Johnson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠55%Jack Johnson (selected)34%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 144
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.5% percentile
33.9% BS Score4 analyzed videos144 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 91.7%91.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 53.8%53.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 30.3%30.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 91.7%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 53.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos