Speaker summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video62 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ivy Wollenzien results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 44.3% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 106 faulty-reasoning hits from 62 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,814 of 28,364 speakers). This Ivy Wollenzien is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Ivy Wollenzien
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠48%Ivy Wollenzien (selected)31%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 62
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos