Speaker summary
44% 2 analyzed articles/videos 241 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isaiah Thomas results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Loss Aversion , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 55.308 hits . Analysis detected 227.308 faulty-reasoning hits from 241 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of 8% (40,589 of 44,012 speakers). This Isaiah Thomas is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group. Isaiah Thomas
Speaker details
Total words: 241
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.8% percentile 7.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos241 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 21.1% 21.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 14.5% 14.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 6.9% Loss Aversion: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst