Speaker summary
69%1 analyzed article/video19 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iranian atomic agency results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 19 hits. Analysis detected 76 faulty-reasoning hits from 19 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,426 of 37,323 speakers). This Iranian atomic agency is worse (more manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Iranian atomic agency
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
94%Iranian atomic agency (selected)100%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 19
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos