Speaker summary
54%8 analyzed articles/videos246.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Monetary Fund results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.8% saturation with 74.326 hits. Analysis detected 253.691 faulty-reasoning hits from 246.333 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.2% and a BS Rank of 23% (21,901 of 28,364 speakers). This International Monetary Fund is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
International Monetary Fund
Speaker details
Total words: 246.333
Article count: 8
Authors