Speaker summary
45%2 analyzed articles/videos31.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Criminal Court results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 112 faulty-reasoning hits from 31.333 analyzed words across 2 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,725 of 24,168 speakers). This International Criminal Court is worse (more manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group.
International Criminal Court
Speaker details