Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video54 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International court results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 108 faulty-reasoning hits from 54 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (2,487 of 38,926 speakers). This International court is worse (more manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group.
International court
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠94%International court (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 54
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos